Will This Draft Bring A Feeling Of Déjà Vu For The Chargers?


If it feels like you’ve heard this once before, it’s probably because you have. Chargers’ General Manager A.J. Smith is again spewing his rhetoric about the club’s possible strategies in the upcoming NFL Draft and if it’s any indication, things could get interesting.

According to the San-Diego Union Tribune, Smith said: “We’re wide open. We have been always since I’ve been here, and we’ve done everything. We’ve gone up in the attack. We’ve bailed out in the past, and we’ve stayed where we are. It depends on circumstance.”

The familiarity that fans feel with this talk is quite understandable as GM Smith made similar comments leading up to the 2010 draft when the team moved up sixteen slots to select running back Ryan Mathews. That year also saw the team move up in the third round to take inside linebacker Donald Butler and one more time for good measure in the fifth round to select nose tackle Cam Thomas.

Any deals will likely be made in the week leading up to draft day or during the process itself, but the GM does have one stipulation. He said: “Don’t bother with three minutes left or less to run some concocted idea that you may have because you’re ready to do something and you’re presenting your case. I’m not interested. I’ve been very consistent with that. I like (to trade), prior to a cut-off. I’ve had a few (offers) along the way from people who don’t understand, more so in the past. But when you’ve been on the job long enough and we all know each other, they pretty much know that ‘let’s just skip the Chargers. Don’t even make that call even though you’d like to do that. It’s too late.’”

Trades have been a part of the draft picture for the Chargers under Smith’s direction as six of his nine drafts with the club have featured some deals. Of course his tenure began with the most infamous trade involving Philip Rivers and Eli Manning, but he has made eight draft day deals in total. Still the team has also had more quiet years where they stand pat and select where they have been slotted in such as last year when zero trades were made on draft day by San Diego.

In sticking with the draft theme, GM Smith attended the Notre Dame pro day on April 3rd to see safety Harrison Smith. It has been reported that he also took a hard look at wide receiver Michael Floyd and was very impressed with what he saw. While the idea of trading has always been a possibility regardless of what players are available, the fact that GM Smith was so enamored with Floyd is particularly worrisome. The team has already inked a number of wideouts this offseason in hopes of replacing Vincent Jackson by committee and drafting another (especially in the first round) would be a big mistake.

As for dealing to get Smith, the idea of trading down and out of round one and taking him early in round two is beginning to gain some appeal from my perspective. Rather than do that very same thing in 2007 with Eric Weddle, GM Smith reached for wide receiver Buster Davis and then proceeded to trade back up in the early second round for Weddle. Getting a do-over is a rare thing as a personnel guru in the NFL, but Smith gets his opportunity this year and hopefully he makes the most of it.

The déjà vu vibe that this year’s draft is giving off is a bit eerie to say the least, but the Chargers were close to making a Super Bowl run back then. This time could provide the team with the talent needed to change that previous outcome and get this team primed for a run in 2012. No one player is going to push the Bolts over that hump, but GM Smith’s acquisitions this offseason along with the development of some younger guys should be enough to improve this club in the coming year.

Now it’s your turn! Is it just me, or are you feeling déjà vu too with the circumstances surrounding the Bolts heading into this year’s draft compared to both 2007 and 2010? Is GM Smith’s track record as a trading machine a positive or a negative when it comes to building a successful roster? Do you see the team having an active draft this year like the one from 2010 or a more subdued selection like last year and picking as allotted? What are your thoughts on trading out of the first round altogether and snagging safety Harrison Smith early on in round two? Please fill up the comments section below with your thoughts on all of this and more!

April 17, 2012

Join our team:

8 comments:

BOLTHYPE said... Apr 17, 2012, 9:15:00 AM

I think OLB Nick Perry in the first, and a trade up to the top of the 2nd for S Harrison Smith would be an amazing couple of picks for the Bolts. - Rob Zepeda

Anthony M. Blake said... Apr 17, 2012, 9:41:00 AM

 Perry and Smith are both fringe 1st rounders by the consensus at the moment. Do you think the team should stay put and take Perry at 16 or slide down a bit and accrue picks in hopes of moving back up then for Smith?

Calum Thompson said... Apr 17, 2012, 10:03:00 AM

Yeah, the better way to do this would be to trade down in the 1st. NE have the ideal picks, but they're unlikely to want to trade up. If we dropped to 24-30 round we could potentially get both perry and smith, but ideally for me, we'd draft hightower and smith then.

BOLTHYPE said... Apr 17, 2012, 10:32:00 AM

Overall, I see this draft class as particularly weak in the two positions the Chargers need the most; Rush OLB and Safety. The Chargers desperately need a playmaker and I don't think trading down is going to help their chances in getting an impact player at those two positions. If anything, the strategy could be to trade up. The Chargers have addressed most of their depth needs through free agency, but still could use better starters.

In this class of Rush OLBs, there are very few "clean" players; there are complaints about Ingram's size, Mercilus' as a one-year-wonder, Upshaw's explosion and natural position... for me Perry is the most dynamic and disruptive player aside from Ingram, who I also like. So I expect those two to be sure-fire first rounders, who could both be gone in the first half of the round.

As for safeties, Harrison gets pushed up in this weak class, and I could see him going in that 25-35 range. Barron will probably go in the first half as well. If the Chargers want either one, they will probably have to move up or "reach". I don't see the Chargers being able to trade down and still getting the best, or second-best, player at either position. They would probably get stuck with the 3rd or 4th best player at two positions that aren't particularly deep this year. - Rob Zepeda

Triplook said... Apr 17, 2012, 11:31:00 AM

trading back is the best plan--i just hope AJ doesnt do anything silly

sanford p said... Apr 17, 2012, 11:46:00 AM

we need pass rushers at least 2 and a safety. Perry, Hightower, Upshaw who will be available.
Safety in second round pass rusher in 3rd also. All sorts of drafts have Chargers picking guard that is just dumb

Fbhansen said... Apr 17, 2012, 12:39:00 PM

I like Michael Floyd but come on now...not another receiver we are okay at the position the better pic would be to fill a hole so Harrison Smith makes more sense! Hey AJ your team is not in the same position as the San Francisco 49ers and you can't get the best player on the board you need to fill holes and IMHO receiver is not a hole but there are plenty on the d-side of the ball! Hope this is a smoke screen! I'm not for trading down and for the Chargers I wouldn't trade out of the first round but if Smith or Mercilus drop down and they can pick one of them up while adding another pic I'd consider it. Unfortunately, if this is to be a make or break year for AJ you'd think he's trading up and might even trade future picks away to get the players needed to at the least win the division. I think that could be the only thing to save his job but who knows with Dean good effort might be enough to save his job again!

threecubed said... Apr 21, 2012, 10:58:00 PM

That might complete the deja vu scenario , reach for a guy  and then give up the future for a guy we need but should of just taken with the first pick . That's the 2007 draft all over , taking Craig Davis at 31 then giving up picks to move back up to 37 to take Weddle . Sure we got Weddle , but we could of had him at 31, kept the picks and let someone else take the Buster . I will say this , Perry is at least 1st round material . 

Post a Comment

What's your take? Registration is not required but we encourage you guys to at least use some sort of screen name to help identify one another in discussions. Use Name/URL If You Don't Sign In Please!

RACISM AND BIGOTRY IS NOT ALLOWED



Newer Post Older Post Home Page

This Week's Popular Posts

SAN DIEGO CHARGERS NEWS

  Chargers.com

  Pro Football Talk

  USA Today

  NFL.com

  San Diego Union - Tribune

  Yahoo! Sports

  ESPN - AFC West

  FOX Sports